PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Liver International0 citations

Validated Nationwide Scoring System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Metabolic Dysfunction‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

View Full Paper
TLTeng‐Yu LeeSSSherlot Juan SongHHHsiu J. Ho

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a scoring system for identifying high-risk patients for hepatocellular carcinoma in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
  • Analyzed Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database for newly diagnosed MASLD patients (2009-2020)
  • Identified key risk factors using a multivariable Fine–Gray hazards model
  • Developed CAMD scoring system based on identified risk factors
  • External validation conducted in independent cohort from Hong Kong
  • 10-year cumulative incidence of HCC was 0.41% in the development cohort
  • Key risk determinants included cirrhosis, age, male sex, and diabetes mellitus
  • CAMD score ranged from 0 to 21, with scores above 13 indicating high-risk patients
  • Concordance indices for HCC prediction were above 0.76 in both cohorts

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background however, MASLD‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a relatively low incidence, posing a public health challenge in identifying high‐risk patients. We aimed to develop a widely implementable scoring system for HCC surveillance. Methods Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database, we identified 232 125 patients with newly diagnosed MASLD between 2009 and 2020 as the development cohort. External validation was performed in an independent cohort of 28 045 MASLD patients from Hong Kong. Both cumulative incidences of and hazard ratios (HRs) for HCC development were analysed after adjusting for competing mortality. Results In the development cohort, the 10‐year cumulative incidence of HCC was 0.41% (95% CI, 0.36%–0.46%). A multivariable Fine–Gray subdistribution hazards model identified cirrhosis, age, male sex, and diabetes mellitus (CAMD) as key risk determinants. These variables were weighted to develop the CAMD score (range: 0–21 points). The concordance (c) indices for HCC prediction in the development cohort were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76–0.82), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77–0.82), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78–0.82) at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. In the validation cohort in Hong Kong, the corresponding c indices were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69–0.82), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71–0.81), and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69–0.77). The predicted and observed HCC probabilities were well‐calibrated in both cohorts. A CAMD score > 13 identified high‐risk patients, with an average annual HCC incidence exceeding 0.2%. Conclusion The CAMD score is an easily calculable tool that can facilitate large‐scale HCC surveillance in MASLD patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d9f5be6419ac0d52a37https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.70534
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper