PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Consciousness Studies0 citations

Looking for the Soft Place Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Getting the Priority Right

View Full Paper
GMGarrett Mindt

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the classification of superpsychism as either cosmopsychism or physicalism.
  • Analyzed the prototime interpretation presented by Schneider and Bailey.
  • Discussed objections to superpsychism in the context of metaphysics of consciousness.
  • Proposed neutral monism as a viable alternative.
  • Argued that superpsychism aligns with either cosmopsychism or physicalism.
  • Identified neutral monism as a theoretical soft place between the two.

Abstract

In a recent paper, Schneider and Bailey (this issue) argue for the view superpsychism by way of their ‘prototime interpretation’, which argues that entanglement occurs in an aspatial/prototemportal level from which, they argue, space-time and consciousness arise. In this essay, rather than arguing whether superpsychism/the prototime interpretation is correct or preferable to other views in the metaphysics of consciousness, I want to focus on the objection that superpsychism is either (1) a cosmopsychist view or (2) a physicalist view, something which the authors themselves discuss in the paper. I argue that superpsychism falls into either a version of cosmopsychism (a rock) or physicalism (a hard place) and should rather look for a soft place between the two (neutral monism).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Garrett Mindt (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6dc15be6419ac0d52eb3https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.33.1.094
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper