Retrospective analysis finds that eye movement variability affects higher-order aberrations post-LASIK, suggesting technology improvements could enhance outcomes.
Purpose: To examine the influence of eye movement variability on postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs), refractive and astigmatic changes after FemtoLASIK. Setting: American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC). Design: Retrospective study Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 eyes from 47 patients treated with the SCHWIND AMARIS system. Intraoperative eye-tracking data captured horizontal (X) and vertical (Y), and radial(R) positional shifts, with variability quantified using mean and standard deviation (STD). Correlations analyses examined the impact of movement fluctuations on postoperative corneal HOAs at 3 months, both unscaled and scaled by planned spherical equivalent (SEq) and astigmatism. Analyses were conducted on the full dataset and repeated using one eye per patient (right eyes only) after exclusion of high-influence points to eliminate pseudo-replication and assess robustness. Results: Increased intraoperative fixation variability was associated with greater postoperative aberrations, with the strongest and most consistent correlations observed for spherical aberration (SA). Variability in horizontal, vertical, and radial eye position showed significant associations with induced SA, which were strengthened when positional measures were scaled by planned SEq. Several associations, particularly those involving SA, remained significant after removing high-influence points and were partially preserved in the one-eye sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: Fixation instability (leading to movement variability) is consistently associated with increased induction of SA, and to a lesser extent, other higher-order aberrations following FemtoLASIK. Improvements in eye-tracking technology performance and fixation stability may reduce aberration induction and improve refractive outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: