Novel methods generate hard negative samples in graph contrastive learning, indicating improved model performance.
Graph contrastive learning (GCL) relies on acquiring high‐quality positive and negative samples to learn the structural semantics of the input graph. Previous approaches typically sampled negative samples from the same training batch or an irrelevant external graph. However, this approach is limited by the problem of sampling false negatives. To address this limitation, this paper introduces a novel method called CGC. CGC uses a counterfactual mechanism to generate hard negative samples that are similar to positive samples but have different semantics. However, CGC faces the challenge of high space complexity due to the storage requirements of augmented graphs. To overcome this challenge, an expansion of CGC is proposed in this paper, called CCGC (compressed CGC), which incorporates a compression module using knowledge distillation techniques to compress the features of augmented graphs. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through satisfactory results on multiple datasets, outperforming traditional unsupervised graph learning methods and state‐of‐the‐art GCL methods. Supplementary experiments are conducted to compare CGC and CCGC at different compression ratios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: