PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation5 citationsOpen Access

Destabilization of Structured RNAs by OPC and TIP4PD Water Models

View Full Paper
MKMiroslav KreplVMVojtěch MlýnskýARAgnesa Rusnáková

Key Points

  • This research investigates how different water models affect the stability of structured RNAs in molecular dynamics simulations.
  • Compared the four-point OPC water model with three-point water models (SPC/E, TIP3P, OPC3) using the OL3 AMBER RNA force field.
  • Simulated three structured RNAs: L1 stalk, miniTTR-6, and GAAA tetraloop.
  • Assessed stability and structural integrity through molecular dynamics simulations.
  • Substantial unfolding and instability observed in OPC water simulations for all examined RNAs.
  • Stable simulations achieved with SPC/E, TIP3P, and OPC3 water models.
  • Identified stronger water-RNA interactions with OPC leading to weakened native interactions.

Abstract

The four-point OPC water model has recently gained a reputation as the preferred choice for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of nucleic acids and proteins, providing more realistic reproduction of bulk physical properties of water than the older three-point models. It has been shown to improve, for example, simulations of unstructured biomolecules such as RNA tetranucleotides or intrinsically disordered proteins. However, the performance for folded RNA structures was not specifically explored. Here we present extensive testing of the OPC water model on three different RNAs with intricate tertiary structures - the ribosomal L1 stalk RNA-protein protuberance, the mini tetraloop-tetraloop receptor (miniTTR-6) folded RNA, and the GAAA tetraloop-tetraloop receptor homodimer. The OPC performance is directly compared with SPC/E, TIP3P, and OPC3 water models using the OL3 AMBER RNA force field (FF). We found substantial effect of the water model on simulation behavior. For all three systems, we observe large-scale unfolding of the RNA, and even loss of the L1 stalk protein-RNA interface, when simulated with the OPC. In contrast, the simulations are entirely stable with the three-point water models. The underlying cause seems to be the higher affinity of the OPC waters to H-bond donor and acceptor groups of the RNA, which weakens the native solute-solute interactions. An identical issue is observed also for the similar and widely used TIP4PD water model combined with the DES-Amber RNA FF. Importantly, the structural consequences of these issues may range from significant structural perturbations to minimal or undetectable effects, depending on the RNA system. Accordingly, we do not claim that the imbalance in water-RNA interactions identified here is a general feature of all RNA molecules. Indeed, simulations of three additional, less structurally complex RNA systems revealed more balanced performance, with no observable differences between water models for the noncanonical 5S rRNA Loop E double helix. However, certain caution is warranted when using the four-point OPC and TIP4PD water models for simulations of structured RNAs, particularly those rich in 2'-OH hydroxyl-based tertiary interactions. For at least some structured RNA systems, the three-point water models may provide more stable behavior in combination with current AMBER RNA force fields.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krepl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6df45be6419ac0d53415https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01678
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper