PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Scientific Reports8 citationsOpen Access

Flood susceptibility assessment using three machine learning techniques and comparison of their performance

TATade Mule AsradeSASintayehu A. AbebeKTKassahun Birhanu Tadesse

Key Points

  • The main aim is to develop effective machine learning models for predicting flood susceptibility and compare their performance.
  • Used diverse datasets including elevation, slope, and land use/land cover as factors for flood susceptibility assessment.
  • Employed three machine learning algorithms: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting.
  • Assessed model performance using confusion metrics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
  • Gradient Boosting and Extreme Gradient Boosting achieved the highest test accuracy of 0.97.
  • Random Forest followed closely with a test accuracy of 0.96.
  • This is the first application of these models for flood susceptibility mapping in the Choke Watershed.

Abstract

Abstract One of the most common natural disasters is flooding, which has the potential to seriously harm environments and infrastructure. Flood susceptibility mapping (FSM) is the main way to manage flood risk. It measures how likely a region is to flood in a quantitative way. The purpose of this study was to develop state-of-the-art ensemble machine learning (ML) models for flood prediction and to identify the most suitable approach for accurate flood susceptibility mapping. This study leverages diverse datasets, including elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, topographic wetness index, stream power index, distance from rivers, soil, rainfall, land use/land cover, and drainage density, which were used as conditioning factors to evaluate flood susceptibility in the Choke Watershed. Three machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Model performance was assessed using confusion matrix metrics and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The Gradient Boosting (GB) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models scored the highest in terms of test accuracy (0.97), followed by RF (0.96). This study is the first application of these models in the Choke Watershed for flood susceptibility mapping, with potential for broader applications to other natural disasters, including earthquakes and landslides. The results help strengthen global efforts aimed at mitigating natural disaster risks, particularly in Ethiopia, and advancing environmental sustainability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Asrade et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e055be6419ac0d53610https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38391-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper