Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Editorial discusses global constitutionalism's evolution in context of enlightenment and crisis response, suggesting a decolonized perspective.
This editorial considers how scholars interested in issues of global constitutionalism should approach the questions that have concerned those interested in enlightenment. Reflecting on the relocation of the journal’s editorial offices to Edinburgh, we foreground discussions from the historiography of the long eighteenth century that should be of interest to scholars of international relations, international law and political theory. Two main contributions are emphasized. First, a contextualist and political approach to enlightenment invites us to see global constitutionalism as a strategic response to crisis, aiming to combat fanaticism. Second, a global approach to enlightenment invites us to continue enlarging the world of global constitutionalism. Taken together, the contributions support the journal’s ongoing efforts to decolonize global constitutionalism by enjoining readers and contributors to attend to neglected sides and sites of global constitutional processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: