PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of High Energy Physics8 citationsOpen Access

Radiative corrections to superallowed beta decays at O (²Z)

ÒCÒ. L. CrosasEME. Mereghetti

Key Points

  • The aim is to compute the $$ ext{O}( ext{α}^2 ext{Z}) $$ radiative corrections to superallowed beta decays using effective field theory.
  • Computed two-loop virtual and one-loop real-virtual amplitudes.
  • Reduced Feynman integrals to a set of master integrals.
  • Solved master integrals analytically using various techniques.
  • Combined ultrasoft corrections with potential photon exchange contributions.
  • Ultrasoft loops induce a relative correction to decay rates ranging from 0.7 ∙ 10 − 3 for 10C to 3.6 ∙ 10 − 3 for 54Co.
  • Inclusion of these corrections lessens renormalization scale dependence significantly.
  • Impacts extraction of Vud at the permille level, thus reducing theoretical uncertainty.

Abstract

A bstract We compute O (²Z) O α 2 Z radiative corrections to superallowed β decays with a heavy-particle effective field theory that systematically describes the interactions of low-energy ultrasoft photons with nuclei. We calculate two-loop virtual and one-loop real-virtual amplitudes by reducing the Feynman integrals to a set of master integrals, which we solve analytically using a variety of techniques. These techniques can be applied to other phenomenologically interesting observables. The ultrasoft corrections can then be combined with contributions arising from the exchange of potential photons to obtain the complete O (²Z) O α 2 Z correction to the decay rate, with resummation of large logarithms of the electron energy times the nuclear radius. We find that O (²Z) O α 2 Z ultrasoft loops induce a relative correction to the decay rate that ranges from 0. 7 ∙ 10 − 3 in the decay of 10 C to 3. 6 ∙ 10 − 3 in the decay of 54 Co, and will thus impact the extraction of V ud at the permille level. We show that the inclusion of these corrections reduces the residual renormalization scale dependence of the decay rate to a negligible level, making missing ultrasoft perturbative corrections a subdominant source of theoretical uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Crosas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e3c5be6419ac0d53cf1https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2026)114
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper