PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Open Research Africa0 citationsOpen Access

Feasibility, acceptance, and workflow integration of an AI-enabled clinical decision support system for non-communicable diseases in Kiambu County, Kenya: A mixed-methods implementation evaluation

View Full Paper
DKDavid KamauSMSamuel MbuguaPOProtus Omondi

Key Points

  • The aim was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptance, and integration of an AI-enabled clinical decision support system for managing non-communicable diseases in Kenya.
  • Conducted a mixed-methods study in 10 health facilities.
  • Performed a retrospective review of 1,929 patient records to assess NCD prevalence.
  • Evaluated clinical acceptance of the AI-CDSS through expert physician reviews.
  • Administered a Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) survey and conducted key-informant interviews.
  • 72.8% of the patient cohort had hypertension; 43.1% had diabetes.
  • 93.3% of expert reviewers agreed with AI-generated clinical recommendations.
  • 86% of clinicians had moderate to good IT proficiency.
  • Identified duplicative data entry as a main barrier to AI-CDSS adoption.

Abstract

Background Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), particularly hypertension and diabetes, impose a growing burden on health systems in low- and middle-income countries like Kenya. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) may enhance diagnostic accuracy and adherence to clinical guidelines, yet their feasibility and acceptability among frontline clinicians in real-world settings remain underexplored. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods implementation study in 10 health facilities in Kiambu County, Kenya. The evaluation comprised three components. First, a retrospective review of 1,929 patient records established baseline NCD prevalence and care patterns. Second, we assessed the clinical acceptance of the NCDAI platform, an AI-CDSS using a Large Language Model with Retrieval-Augmented Generation, through 300 independent expert physician reviews of its recommendations. Third, we captured clinician perspectives via a cross-sectional Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) survey (n=29) and key-informant interviews (n=11). Results The baseline cohort demonstrated a substantial NCD burden: 72.8% had a history of hypertension and 43.1% had diabetes. Expert validation showed high acceptance of AI-generated recommendations, with 67.0% “Agreed,” 26.3% “Partially Agreed,” and only 6.7% “Disagreed,” yielding 93.3% overall (partial or full) agreement. Most disagreements arose in medication and treatment plan recommendations. Clinicians demonstrated strong digital readiness; 86% reported moderate or good IT proficiency, and 69% were already aware of AI in healthcare. Patient-related factors were the most commonly cited barriers to NCD care (33%). Qualitative findings identified operational challenges particularly duplicative data entry arising from parallel paper-based workflows as the main impediment to NCDAI adoption amid high patient volumes. Conclusions An AI-driven CDSS for NCD management is feasible and highly acceptable to expert physicians and frontline clinicians in Kenya. The key barrier is not reluctance toward AI but workflow friction. Effective scale-up will require investment in digital infrastructure to enable seamless integration and replacement of paper-based systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kamau et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e5a5be6419ac0d54036https://doi.org/10.12688/openresafrica.16362.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper