PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology3 citationsOpen Access

Female Offending Trajectories: A Systematic Review

CCC.E. ColesAWAlice WickershamMLMadison Lankester

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze various trajectories of female offending behaviors and their social implications.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 26 studies across 7 countries.
  • Summarized findings from approximately 92,023 individuals with offending behaviors.
  • Identified key offending groups based on trajectory theories.
  • Identified six distinct trajectories: early-onset desistant, adolescent-limited, low and medium-rate chronic, life-course persistent, late-onset, and sporadic.
  • Life-course persistent trajectories were found in 0.4 to 23.4% of female offenders, conflicting with previous theories.
  • Highlighted the significant societal costs due to the intergenerational impact of female offending behaviors.

Abstract

Abstract Female offending behaviours are a complex public health issue associated with significant economic and social costs. The criminal careers of offending females have been studied to a lesser extent than those of offending males. This study thus sought to systematically review the literature on female offending trajectories. Twenty-six studies in 7 countries over 3 decades were identified (approximately N = 92,023 individuals with offending behaviours although some cohorts may have been reported in more than one publication; reported median of 16.5 years of follow-up). Early-onset desistant, adolescent-limited (AL), low and medium-rate chronic, life-course persistent (LCP), late-onset and sporadic groups were all identified. Although trajectory investigations in female-only samples typically identified fewer trajectories than in mixed-gender/sex samples, the trajectories identified were similar. Contrary to Moffitt’s original theory, there was evidence that LCP female trajectories did exist, representing between 0.4 and 23.4% of female offenders. The societal cost of persistent offending is significant, due to the intergenerational impact associated with women’s involvement in the criminal justice system. Identifying the main offending trajectories amongst female offenders allows us to tailor interventions for groups based on specific patterns and risk-periods. Limitations of the extant evidence base include limited follow up times, small sample sizes and limited global coverage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coles et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6e6e5be6419ac0d54267https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-026-00295-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Education and social care predictors of offending trajectories: A UK administrative data linkage study2023 · 1 citations
  2. 2Formal System Processing of Juveniles: Effects on Delinquency2010 · 191 citations
  3. 3The age of adolescence2018 · 3,559 citations
  4. 4Male antisocial behaviour in adolescence and beyond2018 · 498 citations
  5. 5Sex differences in offending trajectories in a Swedish cohort2012 · 50 citations