Mice with IL-17A antagonism showed reduced oxidative stress in vascular inflammation, suggesting complex treatment needs.
Introduction: The pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-17A (IL-17A) has a key role in the inflammatory cascade and promotes vascular inflammation and dysfunction. In addition, IL-17A is centrally involved in several autoimmune diseases. IL-17A deficiency has been linked to reduced vascular inflammation associated with attenuated arterial hypertension under long-term angiotensin II (Ang II) exposure for four weeks. This is of interest as IL-17A is one factor linking several autoimmune diseases with cardiovascular comorbidity. So far, little is known about the effects of IL-17A during the early stages of vascular dysfunction development—an interval possibly representing an optimal therapeutic window. Methods: Mice lacking the IL-17A receptor alpha (IL-17RAdel) and wild-type counterparts were treated with Ang II for one week (1 mg/kg bodyweight/week). We assessed systemic oxidative stress formation and vascular function, as well as inflammatory cells in the vessel wall. In parallel, C57BL/6J mice treated with Ang II received anti-IL-17A therapy, to evaluate the same parameters. Results: Both IL-17RA-deficient mice and anti-IL-17A-treated C57BL/6J mice exhibited an attenuated oxidative stress response and mitigated vascular inflammation following one week of Ang II treatment. These effects did not significantly prevent the onset of Ang II-induced vascular dysfunction at that timepoint. Conclusions: After one week of Ang II treatment, antagonizing IL-17RA or IL-17A only partially reduced/attenuated the Ang II-induced effects on the vasculature. In the context of IL-17A-driven autoimmune diseases with associated vascular pathology, our findings suggest that anti-inflammatory therapies alone may not be sufficient to attenuate vascular impairment. A combined approach including agents with direct protective vascular effects may be required for effective intervention for the associated vascular comorbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: