This analysis demonstrates extremal expected shortfall regressions estimating healthcare spending based on temperature changes, indicating practical applications.
This paper proposes feasible inference methods for extremal expected shortfall (ES) regressions. While standard ES regressions consider a fixed probability level, in extremal ES regressions the probability level becomes more extreme as a function of the sample size. We show that in extremal ES regressions the convergence rate of the parameter estimators is no longer root-n (as in standard ES regressions), but depends intricately on the probability level and on the tails of the outcome. For the conditional distribution of the outcome given the covariates, we work under a Pareto-type tail assumption, and we allow for serially dependent observables. We also prove that the “beyond the sample” ES can be estimated consistently by exploiting the Pareto-type tail shape. Monte Carlo simulations show the adequate size of our tests, which are based on self-normalization. Finally, an empirical application to health care spending as a function of temperature deviations demonstrates the practical usefulness of our inference and estimation tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: