Abstract Background High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy delivers concentrated radiation to the tumor by placing a high‐dose‐rate radioactive source directly inside the target. However, the sharp dose falloff also increases susceptibility to errors and uncertainties. Purpose To enhance source localization accuracy relative to room coordinates and the implant, we optimize the design of a flat‐panel‐based source localization system for HDR brachytherapy. Methods Gamma rays from the Ir‐192 Flexisource were simulated with Monte Carlo for image reconstruction. A 50 × 50 cm 2 flat‐panel detector was placed 15 cm beneath the couch, in which four tungsten ball bearings (BB) are attached. The source location relative to the couch was determined via triangulation. We assessed source localization accuracy based on couch‐BB positions, sizes, BB‐to‐source distance (BSD), and BB‐to‐detector distance (BDD). Since the implant can shift independently, determining the source location relative to the implant, rather than room coordinates, is critical for target dosimetry. To achieve this, a dummy wire containing six tungsten BBs, aligned linearly with increasing separations, was inserted through one of the posterior implanted catheters. The source position relative to the implant was then determined using a rigid transformation that best matched the wire‐BB projections. Results Relative to the room coordinates using the couch‐BBs, the proposed system achieves 0.78 mm accuracy. Localization error increases with larger BSD and smaller BDD, ranging from 0.3–2.5 mm (BSD: 10–30 cm) and 0.3–1.2 mm (BDD: 30–10 cm). Introducing implant motion (15 mm translation, 10 pitch) resulted in 15.8 mm source localization error in room coordinates, while the proposed wire‐BB registration method reduces the error to 1.26 mm relative to the implant. Conclusion The study demonstrates the feasibility of using a flat‐panel detector, couch‐attached markers, and a dummy wire for robust localization of the HDR brachytherapy source relative to both the room coordinates and the implant.
Ling et al. (2026) studied this question.