PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Sports Analytics0 citationsOpen Access

Double steals in Major League Baseball

View Full Paper
RORebecca OrtegaRLRichard A. LevineJOJ. Osborne

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of double steal attempts in baseball, focusing on their impact on run value.
  • Analyzed observational play-by-play data from MLB from 1980 to 2023.
  • Used propensity score methods adapted from personalized medicine.
  • Applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate causal effects.
  • Double steals with runners on 1st and 2nd base are associated with increased run value.
  • No consistent benefit was seen for double steals with runners on 1st and 3rd base.
  • Notably, the increase in run value was especially observed in the 2023 season.

Abstract

Stealing a base in baseball involves risk but can create scoring opportunities. We evaluate the effectiveness of double steal attempts–in which two runners attempt to steal bases simultaneously–using observational play-by-play data from Major League Baseball spanning 1980 to 2022, plus the 2023 season following significant rule changes. Our outcome is run value, which measures the change in expected runs resulting from a play. To estimate the causal effect of a double steal attempt across different base-runner configurations, we apply propensity score methods adapted from the personalized medicine literature, specifically inverse probability of treatment weighting. We find that double steals with runners on 1st base and 2nd base are associated with increased run value, especially in 2023. In contrast, double steal attempts with runners on 1st base and 3rd base show no consistent benefit. These findings suggest that, although the double steal may be underutilized in Major League Baseball, it may be a valuable strategy when applied in the right context.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ortega et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6ebb5be6419ac0d54886https://doi.org/10.1177/22150218251414487
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper