Proposes a grid-based method to assess spatial accessibility of green spaces in Seoul, indicating improvements over traditional methods.
The conventional Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) method treats large-scale facilities as single centroids, leading to systematic under- and overestimation of spatial accessibility measures. To address this limitation, this study proposes a Grid-based G2SFCA methodology that disaggregates supply facilities into grid cells to better capture their shape and assigns them as multiple access points. Using green spaces in Seoul, South Korea, as a case study, we compared the measures from the proposed method with the conventional centroid-based approach using descriptive statistics and spatial inequality indices. The results indicate that the grid-based method significantly stabilized the distribution, nearly halving the standard deviation and reducing the Gini coefficient. In addition, our proposed method corrected the centroid-induced overestimation of accessibility and provided a more precise identification of underserved areas. By resolving the supply-side centroid problem, our study provides a more robust and realistic foundation for assessing spatial equity in urban planning and resource allocation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: