Demonstrates non-invasive screening of pesticide residues in olives and leaves, indicating potential for reliable field deployment.
This study advances non-invasive screening of pesticide residues in olives by (i) extending visible–near-infrared (VNIR) hyperspectral imaging (HSI) from fruit to leaves (adaxial/abaxial) as easy-to-sample matrices; (ii) replacing hard-decision with probabilistic models, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost); and (iii) introducing a tunable reject-option via an indecision band to trade coverage for reliability. An intelligent pixel-selection pipeline (radiometric normalization, HSV masking of glare/defects, and mask-conditioned random sampling of ~ 10⁴ ∼ 10 4 pixels per sample) was used. Ground-truth labels were obtained by GC–MS/MS against EU MRLs. On fruit, deltamethrin and diflufenican reached near-ceiling discrimination (AUC ≈ 99 ≈ 99 –100%, F1 ≈ 97 ≈ 97 –100%); on leaves, oxifluorfen and tebuconazole were best resolved (adaxial/abaxial AUC up to ≈ 95 ≈ 95 –100% with F1 ≈ 99 ≈ 99 %). In contrast, diflufenican shows reduced discriminability on leaf matrices, especially abaxial. Probabilistic outputs enabled an indeterminate label for low-confidence pixels identified via a model-specific indecision band, yielding high accuracy on accepted predictions while keeping the rejected share operationally manageable; an effective score (F1 ₑff eff ), defined as a coverage-penalized F1 score, summarizes this coverage–reliability balance. Overall, coupling matrix selection (fruit vs. leaf side) with probabilistic modeling and abstention delivers robust laboratory performance and a realistic pathway to field deployment at cooperative intake, where indeterminate lots can be routed to secondary handling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: