PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Subcutaneously Administered Tislelizumab in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pharmacokinetics and Safety Results from the BGB-A317-103 Phase I Study

View Full Paper
MCMinjiang ChenChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeIBIurie BulatInstitutul Oncologic din Republica MoldovaMMMarina MaglakelidzeNational Cancer Center of Georgia

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous tislelizumab in treatment-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Conducted as a multicenter, open-label, Phase I study.
  • Assessed two parts: dose exploration with subcutaneous and intravenous tislelizumab, and a dose expansion with subcutaneous administration only.
  • Included chemotherapy during the first 4 to 6 cycles.
  • Subcutaneous administration produced higher trough concentrations than intravenous at 23.1 μg/mL (thigh) and 19.5 μg/mL (abdomen).
  • Bioavailability was estimated at 85.6% for thigh and 72.4% for abdomen.
  • Overall response rate was 44.4%, with no new safety signals or injection site reactions.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for various indications intravenously. Subcutaneous delivery offers potential advantages in convenience and resource utilization. BGB-A317-103 assessed pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous tislelizumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods: BGB-A317-103 is an open-label, multicenter, phase I study. In Part 1 (dose/injection site exploration), patients received subcutaneous tislelizumab (abdomen or thigh injections; 300 mg) in 2 of the first 3 cycles and intravenous tislelizumab (200 mg) in the remaining cycle, followed by intravenous tislelizumab thereafter. In Part 2 (dose expansion), patients received 300 mg of subcutaneous tislelizumab in the thigh in all cycles. Both parts included chemotherapy during the first 4 to 6 cycles. Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety were assessed. Results: At data cutoff (December 6, 2024), in Part 1 (N = 39), subcutaneous administration yielded higher trough concentrations than intravenous (geometric means: 23.1 μg/mL thigh, 19.5 μg/mL abdomen, and 14.8 μg/mL intravenously). Estimated bioavailability was 85.6% (thigh) and 72.4% (abdomen). In Part 2 (N = 22), subcutaneous tislelizumab in the thigh showed consistent pharmacokinetics with Part 1. Preliminary analysis showed overall response rate of 44.4%; median duration of response and median progression-free survival were not reached. Tislelizumab’s safety profile was consistent with previous studies, with no new signals or injection-site reactions. Conclusions: Subcutaneous tislelizumab demonstrated high bioavailability after thigh and abdomen injections. Safety and efficacy were consistent with previous tislelizumab plus chemotherapy studies, warranting further investigation of subcutaneous tislelizumab.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6edc5be6419ac0d54c5ahttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-2173
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper