PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Fluid Mechanics0 citationsOpen Access

Turbulent flame–wall interaction: dynamics of flame thickness and combustion regime

CCCheng ChiBCBénédicte CuenotDTDominique Thévenin

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand the dynamics of flame thickness and combustion regimes during turbulent flame-wall interactions.
  • Conducted direct numerical simulations for premixed H₂/air and NH₃/H₂/air flames.
  • Analyzed both isothermal and adiabatic walls in a fully developed channel flow.
  • Proposed a ridge-based flame surface identification method to track flame fronts accurately.
  • Quantified various parameters, including turbulent burning rate and flame strain rates.
  • Rapid increase in chemical flame thickness near the wall primarily due to zero-flux boundary condition for diffusion.
  • Minor effects from wall heat loss and turbulence.
  • Flames laminarize near the wall and align parallel to isothermal walls before quenching.
  • Flames transition to a laminar regime before wall quenching, challenging previous suggestions of a broken reaction regime.

Abstract

In this study, direct numerical simulation of a turbulent flame–wall interaction (FWI) has been done for premixed H ₂/ air and NH ₃/ H ₂/ air flames in a fully developed channel flow at Re _ 300. Both isothermal and adiabatic walls are considered. The results contribute to further clarification of the underlying mechanisms of FWIs. First, the underlying mechanism for the rapid increase of chemical flame thickness near the wall is found to be the zero-flux boundary condition for diffusion. Effects of wall heat loss and wall turbulence are minor. Then, a ridge-based flame surface identification method is proposed to track the flame front, which is found to be more accurate than an isosurface of C (the progress variable), especially during FWIs. Using this technique, the near-wall flame geometry and orientation are correctly captured. It is found that the flames are laminarised near the wall and almost parallel to the isothermal wall shortly before quenching. Flame–vortex interactions lead to entrained flame pockets for H ₂ as a fuel and to a distributed reaction zone for the case of NH ₃/ H ₂. Finally, the turbulent combustion regime is investigated by checking wall-distance-dependent Reynolds number and Karlovitz number. It is found that the flames enter the laminar flame regime shortly before wall quenching, instead of the broken reaction regime suggested in previous studies. To support the analysis, the turbulent flame dynamics, including turbulent burning rate, turbulent flame surface area, flame stretch factor, local displacement speed, flame dilatation, flame strain rate (both tangential and normal) and flame alignment with the principal strain rate are quantified, providing a full picture of near-wall turbulent flames for the considered conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6f5f5be6419ac0d552d4https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2026.11189
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper