PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Head & Neck0 citationsOpen Access

Skull Base Surgery in the Pediatric Population—The 2nd International Collaborative Study (1995–2015)

View Full Paper
DFDan M. FlissOUOmer J. UngarHLHelena Levyn

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess management, survival, and clinical outcomes of pediatric skull base tumors globally from 1995 to 2015.
  • Review data from 28 institutions on 3061 patients with skull base tumors
  • Analyze clinical variables and outcomes for 64 pediatric patients
  • Assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) along with associated multivariable factors
  • Male-to-female ratio of participants was 37:27
  • Median age at diagnosis was 14 years
  • Most common malignancy was sarcoma (57.8%)
  • Negative surgical margins achieved in 53.1% of cases
  • Adjuvant radiotherapy improved survival outcomes.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The current study presents the efforts of a global collaborative group to review the management and outcomes of malignant tumors of the skull base in the pediatric population worldwide. Patients and Methods A total of 28 institutions contributed data on 3061 patients. From this, there were 64 pediatric patients (2.1%). Clinical variables, overall and disease‐free survival (OS and DFS) outcomes, and multivariable factors associated with outcome were evaluated. Results The male‐to‐female ratio was 37:27 and the median IQR age at diagnosis was 14.0 9.6–16.0 years. The most common malignancy was sarcoma (57.8%), followed by esthesioneuroblastoma (25.0%) and carcinoma (17.2%). Negative margins were achieved in 53.1% children. Dural invasion was associated with reduced OS and DFS. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved survival outcomes. Conclusions Open approaches were widely used for pediatric skull base tumor resection in the period between 1995 and 2015 but we saw a rise in the use of endoscopic and combined techniques by the end of the period covered by this study. Our results may represent a transitional era in which alternative endoscopic techniques continue to expand.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fliss et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6f5f5be6419ac0d55337https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper