This workflow combines chemist insight with AI to enhance COF synthesis efficiency and effectiveness, suggesting new experimental directions.
The synthesis of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) is still largely driven by chemists' literature-informed intuition and iterative trial-and-error, which can be difficult to scale and reproduce. Here we present a chemist-guided human-AI workflow that digitizes this reasoning loop─search, hypothesis formation, and iteration─by coupling a structured literature knowledge base with retrieval-augmented large language models and experiment-aware updates. We first construct a COF synthesis knowledge base containing 2709 protocols extracted from over 800 publications. Given an unseen linker combination, the workflow retrieves a Top-K neighborhood and assembles evidence through stratified sampling and context permutation, generating a range-type synthesis prior over solvent system, catalyst, temperature, time, and stoichiometry. A diagnosis module then interprets macroscopic observations together with powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) files using a failure taxonomy and proposes targeted updates and next-round experiments. In leave-one-out benchmarks on 60 held-out COFs, the best context-assembly and self-consensus settings improve solvent-catalyst hit rates from baseline levels to up to 0.83, supporting robust transfer beyond individual case studies. We demonstrate the workflow by synthesizing two fluorinated COFs, TAPPy-4F and TAPPy-8F, both exhibiting crystallinity and permanent porosity. By simulating the chemist's reasoning loop, this human-AI system integrates expert knowledge with model-driven exploration, offering a generalizable and scalable paradigm for the rational design of complex reticular materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: