What question did this study set out to answer?

This research compares the effectiveness of AI tools and established guidelines in addressing questions about gestational diabetes.

February 13, 2026Clinical Laboratory0 citations

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Guidelines in Answering Questions on Gestational Diabetes: a CLEAR Tool Analysis

GKGökhan KökerAntalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi LKLütfullah Zahit KoçAntalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi MCMuhammed Coşkuner

Key Points

This research compares the effectiveness of AI tools and established guidelines in addressing questions about gestational diabetes.
Evaluated content completeness and relevance of ChatGPT and Google Bard.
Assessed readability of AI-generated responses.
Identified misinformation in AI outputs.
Both AI tools show strengths in content completeness and relevance.
Readability issues are evident in responses from both AI tools.
Misinformation prevalence is a concern, calling for better integration of AI with supportive sources.

Abstract

ChatGPT and Google Bard perform well in content completeness and relevance but face challenges in readability and misinformation. Future research should improve accuracy and readability, integrate AI with peer-reviewed sources, and ensure healthcare professionals guide patients to reliable AI information.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper