This analysis reveals how salience influences action without negating agency, suggesting implications for responsibility attribution.
This paper develops a structural account of salience and examines how manipulation and control operate through salience without bypassing, replacing, or overriding agency. Salience is treated as a pre-interpretive constraint that conditions which informational transitions become available for valuation and action. Manipulation is analyzed as restructuring salience rather than inducing deception or altering preferences, and control is characterized as constraint shaping rather than authorship replacement. The account shows how action spaces may be narrowed or closed without negating agency, and why responsibility attribution must be addressed at downstream regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Semprevivo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: