This preprint derives structural conditions for coherent system description, indicating implications for understanding system dynamics.
This preprint derives the minimal structural conditions required for coherent system description under persistence and change. Beginning from a single non-ontological commitment—that distinguishability can persist—it shows that any theory admitting persistence must distinguish between a reversible, pre-commitment regime and an irreversible commitment regime. The derivation stops deliberately at the point where quantification becomes necessary, specifying an intelligibility floor rather than a complete theory. This document advances no positive explanatory claims and introduces no ontological commitments. It is a boundary result, not a thesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew R. Anderson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: