Evaluates nanochelated iron's impact on kidney bean productivity under drought stress, suggesting it is a viable solution.
Drought stress poses a formidable abiotic challenge that severely curtails crop productivity. This study evaluated the effectiveness of foliar-applied nanochelated iron (nanochelated-Fe) compared to ionic Fe²⁺ in kidney bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under both nondrought and drought conditions. A one-year field trial was performed following a randomized complete block design consisting of three replicates (six plants per treatment), and P. vulgaris grown under nondrought (70% field capacity) and drought (50% field capacity) stress was foliarly treated with equivalent concentrations of nanochelated-Fe or ionic Fe²⁺ (0, 50, 200, 500, and 1000 mg Fe L − 1 ) and compared with untreated control. Untreated plants under drought stress had significantly lower photosynthetic pigments, underscoring the vulnerability of the crop to drought. Remarkably, foliar application of 1000 mg L − 1 nanochelated-Fe under drought resulted in significant increase in grain yield (47%), protein content (21%), protein yield (78%), and grain iron (36%) compared to untreated control. Under non-drought conditions, similar benefits were recorded with 27%, 22%, 55%, and 31% increases in grain yield, protein content, protein yield, and grain Fe concentration, respectively. Moreover, nanochelated-Fe treatment outperformed ionic Fe²⁺ by providing an extra 7% increase in protein content and an 8% enhancement in grain Fe concentration. These superior outcomes are attributed to the nanochelated-Fe’s ability to mitigate oxidative stress, modulate proline and carotenoid levels, reduce electrolyte leakage, and improve relative water content. These findings demonstrate that nanochelated-Fe may serve as a sustainably effective strategy for improving kidney bean production and nutritional quality, particularly in regions experiencing moderate drought stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heidarian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: