PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Machines0 citationsOpen Access

Application of CILQR-Based Motion Planning and Tracking Control to Intelligent Tracked Vehicles

HJHaoyu JiangQLQunxin LiuGWGuiyin Wang

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance the safety of paths and the precision of tracking control in intelligent tracked vehicles.
  • Investigated CILQR-based motion planning and tracking control framework.
  • Utilized an improved quadratic smoothing algorithm for optimal path generation.
  • Developed an LQR-MPC hybrid control method based on discretization error model.
  • Conducted real-vehicle tests on an experimental platform.
  • CILQR algorithm reduces computation time to 1.5 ms per iteration, ensuring real-time performance.
  • Achieved a lateral tracking error of only 5.7 cm at 0.5 m/s during field tests.
  • Demonstrated efficient obstacle avoidance and precise trajectory tracking capabilities.

Abstract

To improve the safety of planned paths and the accuracy of tracking control for intelligent tracked vehicles, this paper investigates the application of a CILQR-based motion-planning and tracking-control framework to intelligent tracked vehicles. Firstly, based on an improved discrete-point quadratic smoothing algorithm and the adapted CILQR, collision-free multi-objective optimal path generation in dynamic environment is achieved. Secondly, based on the discretization error model of the intelligent tracked vehicle, an LQR-MPC hybrid control method is proposed based on switching strategy. Finally, an experimental platform is formed, and real-vehicle tests are carried out. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed framework. The adapted CILQR algorithm significantly reduces computation time to approximately 1.5 ms per iteration, ensuring real-time performance. Furthermore, field tests confirm that the hierarchical LQR-MPC controller achieves robust tracking with an average lateral error of only 5.7 cm at a speed of 0.5 m/s, effectively validating the system’s capability in obstacle avoidance and precise trajectory tracking.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011172ccff479cfe57808https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14020219
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper