Experimental study demonstrates improved bolt state detection accuracy in transmission lines, indicating enhanced safety support.
Purpose Bolts are essential fastening components in transmission lines, and their absence can pose serious electrical safety risks. This paper aims to propose a lightweight bolt state detection method based on a dynamic weighted loss function to address the challenges of high missed detection rates and positional drift. Design/methodology/approach First, a bottleneck residual module is introduced to replace the VGGNet16 backbone in the SSD framework, thereby constructing a lightweight detection network; Second, a multilevel confidence feature extraction module is designed to capture classification features related target confidence, providing data support for the computation of the composite loss; Third, a center-focused loss is incorporated as a constraint to form a composite loss function, enhancing the overall detection performance; Finally, the model’s capability to distinguish hard samples is further improved by constructing a dynamic weight function through hard-sample mining and dynamic weight adjustment based on confidence factors. Findings Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method increases the F1 score for bolt state detection has increased from 74.73% using the original SSD to 85.77%. Compared with other lightweight models, it also achieves better performance, providing strong technical support for intelligent inspection and maintenance of transmission lines. Originality/value The proposed method introduces a lightweight bolt state detection approach by integrating a bottleneck residual module into the SSD framework and designing a multi-level confidence feature module. A novel composite loss function and a dynamic weighting strategy for hard samples further enhance detection accuracy. This method significantly improves F1 score and reduces missed detections, offering a valuable solution for intelligent inspection of transmission lines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: