PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026PLOS Global Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

A service evaluation of clinicians’ Signposting of asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) attending an emergency department in South-West England

View Full Paper
DDDaniel DolanAGAssaf Givati

Key Points

  • The evaluation aims to assess how clinicians signpost asylum seekers and refugees attending emergency departments and identify improvements.
  • Mixed-methods survey to assess clinician practices
  • Purposive sampling of 50 participants (30 medical staff, 20 nursing staff)
  • Descriptive statistical analysis of quantitative data
  • Conventional content analysis of qualitative data
  • Identified inconsistencies in knowledge of ASRs' health entitlements
  • Revealed suboptimal practices in addressing barriers to access
  • Highlighted limited knowledge of local services available for ASR patients

Abstract

Recent changes to health entitlements for asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) in the UK may exacerbate existing barriers of access to healthcare for ASR patients and lead to greater numbers seeking emergency care. In the city in South-West England where this Formative Service Evaluation took place, there has been an increase in the population of ASR patients living in temporary accommodation and their usage of local health services is expected to increase. This Formative Service Evaluation evaluated clinicians’ assessment and signposting of ASRs attending an Emergency Department in South-west England, by assessing three identified components of the service. It informed interventions that were then developed to improve the service. A mixed-methods survey was used to evaluate the service, whereby clinicians manage and signpost care for ASRs attending the Emergency Department. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 50 participants, including 30 medical and 20 nursing staff. Quantitative survey data was analysed using descriptive statistical analysis and qualitative data was analysed using conventional content analysis. This evaluation points at some inconsistencies of knowledge of ASRs health entitlements within the service; suboptimal practice of understanding and acting on barriers to ASRs’ access to emergency service, and limited knowledge of local services available for ASR patients. Understanding the factors and circumstances affecting challenges to service provision to ASRs is important in developing strategies to improve this service.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dolan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011522ccff479cfe57e17https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005748
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis2005 · 45,083 citations
  2. 2A systematic review of asylum-seeking women's views and experiences of UK maternity care2019 · 60 citations
  3. 3Refugee and Immigrant Community Health Champions: a Qualitative Study of Perceived Barriers to Service Access and Utilisation of the National Health Service (NHS) in the West Midlands, UK2021 · 21 citations
  4. 4Vulnerable migrants’ access to healthcare in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK2021 · 33 citations
  5. 5Connecting Refugees to Medical Homes Through Multi-Sector Collaboration2018 · 13 citations