PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Inpatient cognitive analytic therapy for emotionally unstable personality disorder: A co‐produced and mixed methods single case experimental design

View Full Paper
HFHelena FranceIRIsobella RychlinskiCGChris Gaskell

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) for emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD) in an inpatient setting.
  • Conducted a four-phase mixed methods single-case experimental design
  • Implemented an eight-session protocol-driven cognitive analytic therapy
  • Assessed intervention competency using the CCAT measure
  • Rated target problems and target problem procedures daily
  • Completed both idiographic and nomothetic outcome measures throughout the study
  • Competently delivered cognitive analytic therapy
  • Notable change in target problems synchronized with therapy phases
  • Most improvement in idiographic outcomes observed during follow-up
  • Reliable improvement noted in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores
  • Patient reported significant personal impact from therapy outcomes

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To coproduce an evaluation of the effectiveness cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) for emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD) conducted during a psychiatric inpatient admission. Design A four‐phase mixed methods single‐case experimental design (i.e. A‐B‐C‐FU design). The first three phases (A‐B‐C) were conducted on an inpatient ward and the follow‐up phase (1 month) coincided with discharge. Methods The intervention was a protocol‐driven eight‐session CAT. Intervention competency was assessed using the CCAT measure. Recognition and revision of three target problems (TPs) and associated target problem procedures (TPPs) were rated at each session. Five idiographic measures (i.e., anxiety, connecting to others, manic mood, obsessional intensity and people‐pleasing) were rated daily across all phases. Nomothetic outcomes (i.e., PHQ‐9 and GAD‐7) were completed at assessment, termination and follow‐up. A change interview with the patient participant was conducted at discharge and follow‐up. The patient participant provides a commentary on the process and outcome of the therapy. Results CAT was delivered competently. Change in TP and TPPs synchronized with CAT phases. Most change in idiographic outcomes occurred during the follow‐up, with discharge being associated with deterioration. There was a reliable improvement to PHQ‐9 and GAD‐7 scores. Changes were rated by the patient as being personally important, impactful and unlikely without CAT. The patient participant’s account of the therapy noted the importance of the inpatient psychological help, the tools of CAT being useful and the ending being painful. Conclusions Brief CAT can be competently delivered on inpatient wards and appeared an acceptable and effective intervention for this EUPD admission. Research directions are provided.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

France et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699011932ccff479cfe5862ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/papt.70038
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Living Through Distress: A Skills Training Group for Reducing Deliberate Self-Harm2012 · 26 citations
  2. 2Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders2013 · 116,071 citations
  3. 3Quality improvement by introduction of 72-hour admission pathway in Forest House Adolescent Unit (FHAU) for young people in crisis2021 · 2 citations
  4. 4Iatrogenic harm from psychological therapies – time to move on2016 · 145 citations
  5. 5A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder2006 · 32,558 citations