Magnetic-Basis Entanglement Chronoscopy in the Aether Physics Model This preprint develops a ledger-first quantification of attosecond, channel-resolved photoionization time delays in helium using the Aether Physics Model (APM) and Quantum Measurement Units (QMU). The central move is to recast the experimentally extracted group delay (Wigner--Smith / Eisenbud--Wigner--Smith delay) into a dimensionless "delay-count" that is native to QMU primitives:\[N(ε) ≡ τ F_q = 1/2φ/dε,ε ≡ E/E_C,_C ≡ m_e c^2.\]In this form, attosecond chronoscopy becomes a direct measurement of phase-slope in normalized energy, without requiring SI seconds in the main derivation. The paper then proposes a minimal "Aether-attachment" ansatz for interelectronic coherence and entanglement unfolding. The outgoing photoelectron is modeled as a compact Compton-function excitation whose finite-time linkage to the residual ion is mediated by the magnetic-charge basis and the Aether unit through a photon-action closure of the form\[phtn = A_u\, {e_emax}².\]Using Ledger One closure, written generically as\[A_u · curl = c^2,\]the photon-action atom closes directly on the QMU primitive set, motivating a magnetic-basis treatment for the attachment/exchange mechanism. A two-channel residual-ion subspace is coupled by a transient linkage\[g(t) = g_0\,e^{-t/τₑₙₜ}, t ≥ 0,\]producing a second-order, level-repulsion-like phase imprint on the channel difference. A geometric overlap argument fixes the coherence fraction as\[χ = ζ\,α,\]where α is interpreted geometrically via scale separation between the electron torus minor radius (classical radius scale rₑ) and the Bohr organization radius (α₀) through\[α² = r_e/α_0.\]With τₑₙₜ parameterized on the Bohr-period scale, the resulting contrast delay obeys a falsifiable collapse prediction:\[Δ N(ε)\,δ(ε)² ≈ constant,δ(ε) ≡ Δ E/E_C.\]Here δ(ε) is re-parameterized about a reference ε₀ for numerical stability inside a chosen data window. This "collapse test" is proposed as an immediately checkable diagnostic in channel-resolved TDSE outputs or future streaking/RABBIT experiments: if the Aether-attachment mechanism captures the dominant scaling, plotting Δ N\,δ² versus ε should yield a near-flat curve for fixed dressing conditions. The manuscript anchors the model to a published helium benchmark channel-contrast Δτ ≈ 232~as, converting this directly into a QMU normalization target Δ N ≈ 2.9× 10⁴ and deriving an explicit constraint algebra for the combined dimensionless prefactor. The narrative is connected to the author's companion APM photoelectric series on photon-action transport, coherence-window quantization, and cardioid photon expansion, which provide additional context for photon-action-mediated exchange. This work is intended as a draft scaffold for targeted falsification: it specifies which measured or simulated quantities are required (channel phases/delays, fitted δ(ε)), what plots to make (collapse and rescaling checks), and what parameter combinations are constrained by the helium benchmark.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Thomson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: