PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 14, 2026SAGE Open0 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic Connectedness Among the Energy ETFs, Sustainability ETFs, and US Technology Sector Indices: An Application of Statistical Modelling

View Full Paper
BFBashir Ahmad FidaModern College of Business and ScienceDSDharmendra SinghModern College of Business and ScienceMNMuhammad NaeemModern College of Business and Science

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how energy, sustainability, and technology ETFs are interconnected over time and across different market conditions.
  • Applied quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) and time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) methodologies.
  • Analyzed data from October 2014 to November 2024 to explore dynamic relationships.
  • Conducted rolling window analyses and subsample estimations for robustness.
  • Used spillover analysis to examine asymmetric connections across market conditions.
  • Under normal market conditions, technology and sustainability ETFs are primary volatility transmitters.
  • During crises like COVID-19, traditional energy ETFs become key systemic hubs for volatility.
  • Following the COVID-19 crisis, sustainability and technology indices regain leadership, with clean-tech ETFs increasing their transmission role.
  • Evidence shows a structural role reversal of transmitters and receivers across different market regimes.

Abstract

This study examines the dynamic connectedness among energy ETFs, sustainability ETFs, and the USA technology sector indices using a quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) and time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) framework over the period October 2014 to November 2024. By incorporating quantile-based spillover analysis, we capture asymmetric transmission mechanisms across market regimes, while robustness checks using rolling windows, TVP-VAR, and subsample estimation confirm the stability of our findings. The results reveal that connectedness is state-dependent: under normal conditions, technology and sustainability benchmarks (XLK, DSI) dominate as volatility transmitters, whereas during crises such as COVID-19, traditional energy ETFs (XLE, VDE, IYE) emerge as systemic hubs. Post-COVID, systemic leadership reverts to sustainability and technology sector indices, with clean-tech ETFs (QCLN) increasingly transmitting shocks, reflecting the rising financialization of ESG-related assets. Overall, the evidence highlights a structural role reversal between transmitters and receivers across regimes, with policy implications for risk monitoring, portfolio hedging, and the design of sustainable investment strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fida et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699012032ccff479cfe58b44https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261419239
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Volatility spillovers among leading cryptocurrencies and US energy and technology companies2024 · 23 citations
  2. 2Interest rate swaps and the transmission mechanism of monetary policy: A quantile connectedness approach2021 · 513 citations
  3. 3Structural Analysis of Cointegrating VARs1998 · 494 citations
  4. 4Time-varying price dynamics of clean and dirty energy portfolios2023 · 16 citations
  5. 5Cognition, market sentiment and financial instability2010 · 87 citations