EFT_P1_RC_GGL: A Strict Closure Test of Galaxy Dynamics and Weak Lensing (Rotation Curves + GGL)

This record provides an audit-oriented, publication-ready archive report for Project P1, together with the tables/figures supplements that enable line-by-line verification of every quoted number. Scope Quantitative comparison under the same data and the same statistical protocol: the EFT Average‑Gravity Framework vs a minimal cold dark matter (DM) NFW baseline (DM_RAZOR). Two probes and one strict consistency test: SPARC rotation curves (RC) + KiDS‑1000 galaxy–galaxy weak lensing (GGL), connected by an RC→GGL closure test under a shared RC‑bin→GGL‑bin mapping. Data and headline results (high level) Data: SPARC RC binned into 2,295 velocity points (104 galaxies; 20 RC bins); KiDS‑1000 GGL ΔΣ(R) with 60 points and the full covariance (4 stellar‑mass bins × 15 R‑points). Main P1 result: EFT outperforms DM_RAZOR in the joint RC+GGL fit by ΔlogL_total = 1155–1337 (relative to DM_RAZOR), and shows stronger closure strength (EFT: ΔlogL_closure ≈ 172–281 vs DM_RAZOR ≈ 127; negative‑control shuffling collapses to ≈ 6–23). Appendix B (P1A): strengthening the DM side with standardized low‑dimensional modules (DM 7+1 + DM_STD + a lensing‑systematics nuisance) does not remove EFT’s closure advantage (see Table B1 / Fig. B1). What is included in this record Bilingual release report (English & Chinese PDFs): full archive‑edition report (v1.1) including Appendix B (P1A). Tables & Figures Supplements (ZIP): all tables/figures cited in the main text (P1) and in Appendix B (P1A). Citation / licensing information and a stable Concept DOI entry for archival referencing. File list (typical names in this record) Main-text supplement: P1_RC_GGL_supplement_figs_tables_ V1_1.zip. Appendix-B supplement: P1A_supplement_figs_tables_ V1_1.zip. Release report PDFs: P1_RC_GGL_report_EN_PUBLICATION_V1_1.pdf and P1_RC_GGL_report_CN_PUBLICATION_V1_1.pdf. Associated full reproducibility packages (Record B, Software) End‑to‑end reproduction from scratch (public‑data download → preprocessing → full inference → regeneration of tables/figures → auditable manifests/checks) is provided in a separate Zenodo software record (Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18526286; CC BY 4.0). That software record contains two runpacks under the same Concept DOI: P1 full_fit_runpack: reproduces the main‑text results (EFT kernel family vs DM_RAZOR) and robustness sweeps. P1A full_fit_runpack: reproduces Appendix B (standardized DM‑baseline stress tests; superseding P1B). DOIs Release report (this record) Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18526334. Full reproducibility runpacks (Record B) Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18526286. Note: This report is a preprint and has not been peer‑reviewed.