This note finds a link between urgency in housing markets and price variations, suggesting that waiting can affect transaction prices.
This note formalizes a simple but under-modeled driver of real estate price dispersion: the price of immediacy. In housing markets, many buyers and sellers want to transact “right now,” and that urgency has a predictable cost. A patient seller holds an implicit time option: by keeping a property exposed to the market long enough, the seller can meet a high-valuation buyer from the upper tail of the demand distribution. An urgent seller effectively sells that time option along with the property and accepts a discount. Symmetrically, a patient buyer holds a time option to continue searching for a better price or match, while an urgent buyer pays a premium to avoid the costs and risks of delay. The paper defines Time–Option Arbitrage as the structural spread generated by heterogeneous time costs (urgency) rather than by information asymmetry, and defines the Time–Option Arbitrage Band as the separable component of expected transaction-price dispersion attributable purely to urgency heterogeneity, holding property information fixed. In a minimal Poisson arrival/search framework with heterogeneous valuations and linear waiting costs, urgency differences alone generate a strictly positive price band even under symmetric information. The analysis also emphasizes that the optimal waiting horizon is bounded by carrying costs and by aggregate price risk (the risk that the market moves against the side that waits). The framework yields practical, testable signatures: motivated-seller discounts relative to matched comparables, deadline-buyer premia, and a widening of discount distributions when markets thin or credit tightens. The goal is “reminder + formalization”: a clean conceptual object and a reusable definition that connects practitioner intuition (“must sell,” “waiting for the right buyer”) to a simple economic mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Christian McKinley (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: