Philosophical analysis proposes a monist ontology for works of art, suggesting improved coherence with cultural practices.
A pluralist ontology of art states that works of art can belong to distinct ontological categories whereas a monist ontology states that all works of art belong to one ontological category. A monist ontology would be preferable since it is more informative about the nature of art, and may pave the way for a definition of art. Yet, monist conceptions struggle to deal with cultural practices of art appreciation. In the first part of the paper, I will discuss the main monist strategies in the ontology of art, and I will argue that all these strategies find it hard to deal with the relevant cultural practices. Then, I will propose a new monist ontology according to which all works of art are norm‐constituted entities. Finally, I will show that this account deals better than its competitors with the relevant cultural practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enrico Terrone (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: