Analysis reveals lower telemedicine utilization among certain groups in surgical oncology, indicating access disparities.
We examined telemedicine use across 38,883 surgical oncology visits (2021-2023) at a Northern California cancer center. At ≥20 miles from clinics, Hispanic (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.68,0.85]), Asian/Pacific Islander (OR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.66,0.84]), interpreter-needing (OR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.59,0.77]), and Medicaid patients (OR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.76,0.96]) had lower telemedicine use, while low-income patients showed higher utilization (OR = 1.67, 95% CI [1.46,1.91]). At <20 miles, no differences were observed for Hispanic, interpreter-needing, Medicaid, or low-income patients, but Asian/Pacific Islanders showed higher use (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.04-1.30]). Geographic distance modifies telemedicine access patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parameswaran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from npj Digital Medicine