Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Umbrella review shows ursodeoxycholic acid improves liver enzymes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, indicating potential benefits for treatment.
Objective This umbrella review aimed to systematically synthesize and evaluate evidence from published meta-analyses regarding the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, focusing on its impact on liver-specific biochemical markers. Methods Following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251250211), a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus (1985–2025) identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating UDCA therapy in MASLD. Methodological quality was appraised using AMSTAR-2, ROBIS, and GRADE frameworks. Data on hepatic biomarkers were extracted and synthesized using fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity (I 2 statistic). Overlap among primary studies was assessed using the GROOVE tool, and meta-regression explored the influence of treatment duration on ALT dynamics. Results Five meta-analyses (33 primary studies; 5,015 participants) were eligible. UDCA demonstrated consistent and statistically significant improvements in key markers of hepatocellular injury, including ALT (SMD = −0.36; 95% CI: −0.69 to −0.03) and AST (SMD = −0.16; 95% CI: −0.22 to −0.10), as well as cholestatic markers such as GGT (SMD = −0.40; 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.18) and ALP (SMD = −0.23; 95% CI: −0.31 to −0.14), total bilirubin decreased modestly (SMD = −0.08; 95% CI: −0.15 to −0.01), while albumin level remained unchanged. Meta-regression showed that longer treatment duration was significantly associated with greater ALT reduction (−0.04 SMD per 6 months; p = 0.034). Conclusion UDCA demonstrates consistent hepatoprotective and cholestasis-modifying effects in MASLD. Longer treatment duration may enhance biochemical responses. Systematic review registration CRD420251250211.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khurmatullina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: