Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case-vignette study reveals provider biases in treating HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer, suggesting a multidisciplinary approach is needed.
Background Current guidelines recommend surgical resection, definitive radiotherapy (RT), or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). This study aimed to provide insight into practice patterns of providers who treat HPV‐associated OPSCC. Methods A five case‐vignette survey was distributed to head and neck surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists who treat head and neck cancer at NCI‐Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Providers were asked to recommend management. Results Eighty‐three providers completed the survey (14% response rate). Head and neck surgeons had a 60% surgical recommendation rate while medical and radiation oncologists had a 58% non‐surgical recommendation rate. Radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend RT and CRT, and medical oncologists were more likely to recommend CRT over surgery compared to head and neck surgeons. Conclusions Provider specialty‐specific biases influence treatment recommendations and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to head and neck cancer care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sridhar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: