Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Controlled feeding trial compares Mediterranean and ultra-processed diets, revealing significant differences in mental health outcomes.
Background Anxiety and depression (A/D) affect 5% of the global population, yet only one in five receives adequate management. Problematic, as co-morbid A/D is common in chronic digestive diseases and negatively influences prognosis and management. Cross-sectional studies associate poor diet quality and high intake of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) with an increased risk of A/D, while adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet (MD) has been linked to improvements in A/D severity. Their comparative effects on mental health outcomes in a controlled feeding trial are unknown. Aims To determine whether adherence to a MD improves symptoms of A/D compared with a UPF diet, using a controlled feeding design. Methods Healthy adults (n = 18) completed a randomized controlled feeding, crossover trial. Eligibility criteria included absence of acute or chronic physical or mental health conditions, medication or substance use, or prior major surgery. Participants consumed a fully catered 3-week UPF diet (85.5% NOVA 4), followed by a 6-week washout period, then a 3-week MD (8.9% NOVA 4). Each diet provided three meals and two snacks daily, matched in energy and macronutrient quantity. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8), and the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) questionnaire were administered at baseline and at the end of week 3 of each diet arm. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U and the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Results Eighteen participants (50% female) completed the study, with a median age of 24.5 years [IQR: 23.0-29.0], and a median Body Mass Index of 24.3 kg/m2 [IQR: 23.2, 25.2]. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) score was significantly higher in MD compared to the UPF (MD: 83.7 [IQR: 82.5-87.50] WD: 41.1 [IQR: 36.4-49.6], p < 0.0001). PHQ-8 scores increased following the UPF diet (median +3.5, p = 0.002), reaching a median score consistent with mild depressive symptoms. At week 3, PHQ-8 scores were significantly higher in the UPF group compared to the MD (median 3.5-point difference, p = 0.004). Quality of life measures declined during the UPF diet, significantly reducing the Mental Component Score (MCS: -8.3%, p = 0.003) and Physical Component Score (PCS: -4.1% p = 0.004). Between-group comparisons at week 3 demonstrated that MCS and PCS improved during the MD compared to the UPF diet (MCS: +6.1, p = 0.009, PCS: +2.4, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in GAD-7 scores. Conclusions Short-term adherence to a UPF diet worsened depressive symptoms and reduced quality of life, while the MD improved or maintained these outcomes. These findings underscore the rapid influence of diet quality on mental well-being and support further research into diet as an adjunct treatment for chronic digestive diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: