Key result
Women with history of preeclampsia had higher carotid backward pressure (p=0.009), pulse pressure (p=0.005), and stiffness (p<0.001) but no mediation of reduced processing speed.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether carotid artery pulsatile pressure hemodynamics and stiffness mediate reductions in cognitive function among women with a history of preeclampsia.
Does a history of preeclampsia increase carotid artery stiffness and pulsatile pressure, and do these factors mediate reduced cognitive function in postpartum women?
Does a history of preeclampsia increase carotid artery stiffness and pulsatile pressure, and do these factors mediate reduced cognitive function in postpartum women?
Women with a history of preeclampsia exhibit greater carotid artery stiffness and pulsatile pressure, as well as lower processing speed, but these vascular changes do not mediate the observed cognitive deficits.
Carotid changes should not yet guide cognitive risk assessment post-preeclampsia; leaves open other mediating pathways.
Introduction: Women with a history of preeclampsia (hxPE) show reduced executive function (EF) and processing speed (PS) compared with a healthy pregnancy (HP). Central (carotid) artery pulsatile pressure hemodynamics and stiffness are associated with reduced cognitive function with aging; but it is unknown if this relation exists in women with a hxPE. We hypothesized that higher carotid artery pulsatile pressure hemodynamics and stiffness would mediate reductions in cognitive function among women with a hxPE. Methods: Carotid artery applanation tonometry, B-mode ultrasonography, and wave separation analysis were used in 121 postpartum women (9 months-5 years after delivery, aged 18-45; n=59 hxPE and n=62 HP) to calculate forward (Pf) and backward (Pb) pressure wave amplitudes, and pulse pressure (PP). Carotid stiffness components were derived by participant-specific exponential modeling. EF and PS were represented as Z-scores. Mediation analysis determined the contribution of carotid outcomes in the association between preeclampsia status and cognitive function. Results: Women with a hxPE had higher carotid Pb, PP, and load-dependent stiffness compared with HP (body mass index and age adjusted, p=0.009, p=0.005, and p<0.001, respectively). After education and age adjustment, the hxPE group had significantly lower PS compared with HP (p=0.009); executive function was not different (p=0.08). No pulsatile pressure hemodynamic or stiffness factor mediated associations between preeclampsia status and PS (all p>0.05). Conclusion: Women with a hxPE have greater carotid PP, Pb and load-dependent stiffness, compared with a HP. Neither carotid artery pulsatile pressure hemodynamics or load-dependent stiffness mediated lower PS among women with a hxPE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2026) studied this question. Women with history of preeclampsia had higher carotid backward pressure (p=0.009), pulse pressure (p=0.005), and stiffness (p<0.001) but no mediation of reduced processing speed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: