Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study examines Medicaid reimbursement rates for orthodontia in patients with cleft lip and palate, suggesting gaps remain despite expansion.
Objective Examine state-level Medicaid reimbursement rates after Medicaid expansion for Phase I and II orthodontia relevant to patients with cleft lip and palate. Design Cross-sectional study of publicly available 2024 state Medicaid reimbursement rates associated with Phase I and II orthodontia. One-Way ANOVA and independent t-tests compared regional and Medicaid expansion groups. Setting National sample of Medicaid reimbursement fee schedules. Patients Fifty US states, including DC, utilizing fee-for-service reimbursement for Medicaid enrollees. Main Outcome Measure(s) Reimbursement Rates for CPT Code D8020 (Phase I: Limited Orthodontia, Transitional Dentition) and D8080 (Phase II: Comprehensive Orthodontia, Adolescent Dentition) were compared between regions and by Medicaid expansion status. Results Ten states did not adopt Medicaid Expansion (19.6%: AL, FL, GA, KS, MS, SC, TN, TX, WI, and WY). Coverage of Phase I care was low overall (58.5% of expanded and 55.6% of non-expanded states), with average reimbursement of $1080.13. More states offered Phase II coverage (87.8% of expanded and 77.8% of non-expanded states). Phase II reimbursement was higher in expansion states ($2596.73 ± $2252.59 vs non-expansion: $1266.78 ± $314.19; P = .001). The South trended toward higher reimbursement for Phase II ($3224.95; P = .093), followed by the West ($2902.88 ± 1327.40 vs $1413.26-$1699.10). Conclusions Provider reimbursement influences access to orthodontia. Although Medicaid expansion aims to improve access for low-income families, gaps in orthodontic coverage persist. Despite higher Phase II reimbursement in Southern and expansion states, inadequate Phase I coverage and low reimbursement schedules limit provider participation, leaving low-income patients with clefts at risk for delayed or absent orthodontia and thus suboptimal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCall et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: