Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chemical screening identifies PACAP as a potential plant immune elicitor, suggesting new therapeutic avenues.
Plants are constantly exposed to a variety of biotic stresses in their natural environment and rely on their immune systems to adapt to these challenges. Pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) constitute two complementary layers of the plant innate immune system, both of which can be activated by immune elicitors. In this study, a pFRK1-GUS reporter system was employed to screen multiple natural product libraries, leading to the identification of the animal-derived neuropeptide pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and its truncated form, PACAP 6–38, as potential plant immune elicitors. Exogenous application of PACAP and PACAP 6–38 triggered multiple PTI-associated immune responses, including cytosolic calcium influx, MAPK phosphorylation, and induction of FRK1 expression under the tested conditions, while notably failing to induce a detectable reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst. Moreover, pre-treatment with PACAP or PACAP 6–38 at the tested concentrations reduced bacterial titers of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 by approximately 0.3–0.7 log units under single-application conditions. Notably, both peptides also enhanced plant resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum , indicating a broader role in bacterial disease resistance. Although the molecular receptors and downstream signaling components remain to be identified, this study establishes a proof-of-concept for cross-kingdom recognition of an animal neuropeptide by plants. Together, these findings highlight PACAP-induced immunity as being uncoupled from the canonical ROS burst, underscoring the conceptual novelty of animal-derived peptides as unconventional elicitors and providing a reference for potential future applications of PACAP in plants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: