Observational analysis reveals maintained glycemic management in children with type 1 diabetes, indicating effectiveness of automated insulin delivery system.
Background The MiniMed 780G was the first commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) system in Poland. The aim of this study was to analyze glycemic management in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after three years of using the system. Materials and methods The data included anthropometric measurements, information from insulin pumps, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) from fifty children with T1D (mean age: 9.9 ± 2.4 years; T1D duration at baseline: 3.9 ± 2.56 years) using the MiniMed 780G. The data were collected at AID initiation, 12 and 36 months after starting its use. Results Coefficient of variation (CV) and body mass index (BMI) z-scores at baseline and after 3 years were comparable (p > 0.05). TITR firstly increased after the AID system implementation with the peak value after 6 months (60.82% ± 9.34), then the values decreased to 56.50%± 10.78% after 3 years (p<0.001). Time in range (70–180 mg/dL) decreased after 3 years of observation compared to peak values at 6 and 12 months (77.74% ± 7.65% versus 81.16% ± 7.83% and 80.40% ± 8.25%, respectively, p<0.005. The percentage of auto-correction in total daily insulin dose increased significantly (11.24% ± 6.08% 2 weeks of AID system usage vs. 16.34% ± 6.69% after 3 years; p < 0.001). Conclusions Despite a slight deterioration after 3 years, optimal glycemic management was maintained throughout the observation period. GCM metrics remained within recommended values in early adolescence, most likely due to auto-correction boluses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarasiewicz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: