Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A single-center study compares assisted reproductive outcomes in women with low ovarian reserve, suggesting potential advantages of specific protocols.
This study aims to compare the outcomes of assisted reproductive treatment in women with low ovarian reserve (LOR), defined as an anti-Müllerian hormone level of ≤1.2 ng/mL, versus normal ovarian reserve (NOR; 1.2 ng/mL < anti-Müllerian hormone ≤3.0 ng/mL) using the long follicular-phase protocol. It further evaluates the efficacy of the long follicular-phase, antagonist, and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols specifically within the LOR population. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 2309 patients treated between October 2022 and October 2024. Participants included 973 LOR patients and 1336 NOR patients. LOR patients were divided by protocol: Group A (long follicular-phase protocol, n = 95), Group C (antagonist, n = 200), and Group D (PPOS, n = 678). All NOR patients received the long follicular protocol (Group B, n = 1336). Groups were stratified by age (<35 and ≥35 years). Regarding the long follicular protocol: In women <35, Group A had significantly fewer retrieved oocytes and high-quality embryos than Group B ( P <.05), yet clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (LBRs) were similar ( P >.05). In women ≥35, Group A had fewer oocytes but a higher MII rate than Group B, with no significant difference in pregnancy or live birth rates. Comparing protocols within the LOR population: Group A exhibited significantly lower baseline hormone levels but higher numbers of punctured follicles, retrieved oocytes, and 2PN fertilized oocytes compared to Groups C and D ( P <.05). Notably, among patients ≥35, Group A produced significantly more high-quality embryos. Generally, age negatively impacted outcomes across all groups. For individuals with LOR, the long follicular-phase protocol yields clinical pregnancy and live birth rates comparable to those with normal reserve, despite lower oocyte yield. Our research findings, while not conclusive in the LOR population, suggest a possible trend that long follicular-phase protocol may offer certain advantages over antagonist and PPOS protocols in key experimental parameters. Nevertheless, age remains a key factor affecting stimulation response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: