PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Applied Sciences2 citationsOpen Access

Data Security and Privacy in GPT Models: Techniques and Challenges

DGDavid GhiurăuDPDaniela Elena Popescu

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate data security and privacy techniques within GPT models and identify associated challenges.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Analyzed 60 peer-reviewed studies from Q1 and Q2 journals between 2020 and 2025.
  • Examined GPT architectures alongside current security and privacy techniques.
  • Identified key challenges such as unintended data memorization and adversarial attacks.
  • Reported accuracy reductions of 5% to 20% with privacy-preserving techniques.
  • Highlighted computational overhead increases of 30-40% with advanced cryptographic methods.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models has led to their widespread adoption across applied domains such as healthcare, finance, education, and enterprise software engineering. However, the large-scale data requirements and generative capabilities of these models introduce significant challenges related to data security, privacy preservation, and regulatory compliance. This paper presents a systematic literature review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, analyzing 60 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2020 and 2025 in Q1 and Q2 journals indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. The review examines the evolution of GPT architectures and evaluates state-of-the-art security and privacy techniques, including encryption, differential privacy, federated learning, data anonymization, model distillation, and secure deployment mechanisms. Key challenges identified include unintended memorization of sensitive data, adversarial prompt-based attacks, and performance degradation resulting from privacy-preserving constraints, with reported accuracy reductions ranging from 5% to 20% depending on the applied technique. Additionally, the analysis highlights increased computational overhead, in some cases exceeding 30–40% training or inference cost when advanced cryptographic methods are employed. Regulatory and ethical implications are assessed in relation to frameworks such as GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and the proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act. The findings emphasize the need for privacy-by-design approaches and scalable governance strategies to support secure and trustworthy deployment of GPT models in applied real-world environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghiurău et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b45f9b75e639e9b094f9https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041900
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing Privacy and Security in Large-Language Models: A Zero-Knowledge Proof Approach2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Harnessing GPT-4 for generation of cybersecurity GRC policies: A focus on ransomware attack mitigation2023 · 88 citations
  3. 3Privacy-Preserving Integration of GPT-4 and Natural Language Processing via Secure Multi-Party Computation for Healthcare Data2025 · 3 citations
  4. 4Embracing the Generative AI Revolution: Advancing Tertiary Education in Cybersecurity with GPT2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Understanding the Role of Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) in Improving Learning Quality and Practices2024 · 3 citations