Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study identifies characteristics linked to high research productivity in physicians, suggesting policy improvements.
Introduction Although physicians’ research productivity contributes to evidence-based practice and health-system learning, productivity is uneven, and little is known about individual-level traits linked with high output in Arab Gulf settings. This study examined physician characteristics associated with higher scientific publication productivity in Bahrain. Methods Cross-sectional study of practicing physicians in Bahrain across primary and secondary healthcare and government/private sectors. Data included age, gender, years of experience, career level, sector and care setting, and lifetime number of peer-reviewed publications. High productivity was defined as ≥5 publications. Associations were examined using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression (SPSS v30.0). Results In total, 239 physicians were responded to the survey (mean age 37.58 ± 11.15 years; 66.5% female; 75.3% government sector; 71.1% secondary care). One in five (≈20%) reported ≥5 publications, while about one-third had none. In univariate analyses, higher productivity was associated with male gender, age ≥40 years, ≥15 years’ experience, advanced career level, and secondary practice (all p ≤ 0.001). In multivariable modelling, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were produced for employment in secondary healthcare remained strongly associated with high productivity (OR 7.364, 95% CI 1.992, 27.225; p = 0.003). Employment in the private sector was associated with lower odds compared with government sector (OR 0.634, 95% CI 0.259, 1.553; p = 0.319). Female gender showed a trend toward lower odds compared to their male counterparts (OR 0.449, 95% CI 0.197, 1.024; p = 0.057). Discussion Research productivity among physicians in Bahrain is concentrated in a small, predominantly male, at advanced career stages and hospital-based doctors, suggesting structural and career-stage inequities in research engagement. An urgent need exists within the healthcare system for a more inclusive research culture that spans primary and secondary healthcare, government and private sectors, and male and female physicians alike.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Roomi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: