Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formal framework establishes a system for iterated selections in perception-action domains, highlighting implications for adaptivity.
A formal framework for iterated selection on perception-action structures. Three definitions — the logon (perception-action dyad), the model (weighted configuration space with internal fitness function), and the carrier (instantiated configuration subject to adjudication) — connected by typed bridge maps and governed by eight explicit axioms. A universal scope declaration asserts all entities and processes are logons, with primitive base types at the bottom composition level.The framework gives a fully typed discrete dynamics on finite/countable spaces, derives results on on-policy identifiability, informational irreversibility, and falsification asymmetry, and defines truth-magnitude as a formal distance between a model's internal fitness map and its effective viability. Compositional structure via operads is deferred to a companion paper.Version history (v3.10 → v3.16)v3.11–v3.12 (from v3.10): First adversarial iteration. Fixed φ_t typing, J_E typing, U constraints, T formula. Added dyad derivation (§4.0) and irreversibility derivation from the dyad (§4.2).v3.13 (from v3.12): Response to first formal critique (countermodel-based). Fixed J̃_E to use model's own policy instead of best-action oracle. Formalized non-degeneracy conditions. Added compositional well-foundedness.v3.14 (from v3.13): Response to second critique ("fake formalism over metaphysics"). Added Technical Conventions section with explicit measure theory. Distinguished J_E dual role (formal vs ontological). Formalized non-degeneracy as three conditions.v3.15 (from v3.14): Response to third critique (17-section type-error teardown). STRUCTURAL SURGERY. Added bridge map ψ: C → 𝓛 connecting configurations to dyads. Added observation kernel Obs: E × C → Δ(S). Added explicit environment state e_t ∈ E. Fully typed 7-step dynamics. J now J(e_t, c_t, a_t). All axioms labeled [A1]–[A7]. "Actuality as instantiation" honestly labeled as axiom. Dyad argument moved to Motivation section. Expansion labeled Conjecture.v3.16 (from v3.15): All spaces committed to finite/countable with discrete σ-algebra. μ_t as weight function C → [0,∞). Added [A7] Feedback monotonicity (persist ≥ prior weight, eliminate = zero). Scope/base-case contradiction resolved (universal scope + explicit primitive base types at bottom level). Worked example (§TC.6) with explicit objects, multiplicative-weights U, and full cycle walkthrough. Removed underspecified model boundary sentence. Continuous extensions deferred to companion papers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: