Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates digital competence in university students, highlighting a flexible measurement framework for curriculum design.
Across European and Western Balkan countries, a persistent misalignment remains between graduates’ digital skill levels and the rapidly evolving demands of the contemporary workforce. Addressing this gap requires evidence-based interventions grounded in multidimensional and psychometrically rigorous assessments of digital competence. This study applies a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (B-ESEM) framework to evaluate university students’ functional digital skills using items from the Youth Digital Skills Indicator. The model integrates a general digital competence factor with four domain-specific dimensions, capturing both shared and unique variance across skill areas. Using data from 603 students, results indicate a strong general digital competence factor alongside meaningful domain-specific contributions. The model demonstrates full measurement invariance across gender and shows predictive validity for technology affinity and digital self-efficacy. These findings underscore the relevance of conceptualizing digital competence as both transversal and domain-sensitive when informing curriculum design and educational policy. The study provides a validated and flexible measurement framework that can guide future research and targeted digital skill enhancement initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frashëri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: