Key result
Telehealth in CV and stroke care improves access and quality when regulatory barriers are addressed.
Why the study?
Legal and regulatory barriers impede telehealth adoption and delivery, requiring a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence and consensus policy suggestions to promote models that ensure better patient access to high-quality cardiovascular and stroke care.
This AHA policy statement provides consensus recommendations for implementing telehealth in cardiovascular and stroke care, addressing regulatory barriers and future research needs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide telehealth adoption amid regulatory hurdles in CV care; leaves open prospective trials on outcomes and equity.
The aim of this policy statement is to provide a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence evaluating the use of telemedicine in cardiovascular and stroke care and to provide consensus policy suggestions. We evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in advancing healthcare quality, identify legal and regulatory barriers that impede telehealth adoption or delivery, propose steps to overcome these barriers, and identify areas for future research to ensure that telehealth continues to enhance the quality of cardiovascular and stroke care. The result of these efforts is designed to promote telehealth models that ensure better patient access to high-quality cardiovascular and stroke care while striving for optimal protection of patient safety and privacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwamm et al. (2016) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease and stroke. Telehealth / Telemedicine was evaluated on Healthcare quality, access to care, patient safety, and privacy. Telehealth models in cardiovascular and stroke care can improve patient access and healthcare quality when legal and regulatory barriers are addressed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: