PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Otolaryngology0 citations

Conductive Hearing Loss Pathologies are Associated With Dementia in the All of Us Research Program

View Full Paper
SPS. Dillon PowellHWHannah N. W. WeinsteinLTLauren H. Tucker

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the connection between specific conductive hearing loss pathologies and dementia.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional epidemiologic study using data from the NIH All of Us Research Program.
  • Analyzed a cohort of 396,194 participants aged 18 and older.
  • Defined conductive hearing loss pathologies using ICD-10 codes, including cholesteatoma, TM perforation, and otosclerosis.
  • Assessed the odds of dementia using multivariable regression while adjusting for covariates such as age and ethnicity.
  • Participants with cholesteatoma had 1.77 times higher odds of dementia compared to those without (P = .015).
  • Individuals with TM perforation had 2.09 times higher odds of dementia (P < .001).
  • Results for otosclerosis were nonsignificant.
  • After surgical treatment, odds dropped to 1.40 for cholesteatoma and 2.01 for TM perforation (P < .001 for TM perforation).

Abstract

Abstract Objective Recently, conductive hearing loss (CHL) has been associated with dementia in two large independent cohorts. However, the disease‐specific association with dementia is unknown. We investigate the association of specific CHL pathologies and dementia in a large national cohort. Study Design Cross‐sectional epidemiologic study. Setting NIH All of Us Research Program. Methods Participants were ≥18 years old (n = 396,194). The exposures were CHL pathologies defined by ICD‐10 code: cholesteatoma (H71.X), tympanic membrane (TM) perforation (H72.X), and otosclerosis (H80.X). The outcome was all‐cause dementia defined by ICD‐10 codes (F01, F03, G30‐32). The odds of dementia in subjects with and without a CHL pathology were assessed with multivariable regression including age, sex, education, race, and ethnicity. Additional analyses included treatments. Results The mean (SD) age was 55 years (±17). After controlling for covariates, the odds of dementia were 1.77 times (1.08‐2.73; P = .015) higher for cholesteatoma compared to those without, 2.09 times (1.68‐2.59; P < .001) higher for TM perforation, and were nonsignificant for otosclerosis. After adding surgical treatment, odds of dementia dropped to 1.40 (0.82‐2.27; P = .198) for cholesteatoma and 2.01 (1.60‐2.50; P < .001) for TM perforation. Conclusions Cholesteatoma and TM perforation were associated with dementia in the All of Us Research Program. Treatment attenuates these relationships. Given the general implausibility for dementia to cause these CHL pathologies, reverse causation—that dementia causes hearing loss—is an unlikely explanation for the association. This study adds to the evidence that cognition is impacted by sensory deprivation but extends to correctable conductive causes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Powell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a768ecb39a600b3ed085https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.70152
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper