PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Anatomy0 citations

Association Between Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae and Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
SKStylianos KapetanakisAristotle University of ThessalonikiMCMikail ChatzivasiliadisInterbalkan Medical CenterCKChristodoulos KizisInterbalkan Medical Center

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the relationship between lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and lumbar spondylolisthesis.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Included studies comparing adults with and without lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.
  • Assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I.
  • Utilized random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled odds ratios and mean differences.
  • Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae did not increase overall prevalence of degenerative spondylolisthesis (OR 1.28).
  • Significantly increased odds of spondylolisthesis at L4–L5 (OR 13.78).
  • Significant protective effect observed at L5–S1 (OR 0.07).
  • No significant difference in slip severity across pooled analyses.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are common congenital spinal anomalies that may redistribute mechanical loads to adjacent segments. This study aims to provide a comprehensive, quantitative synthesis of the relationship between LSTV 95% CI 0.86–1.91; p = 0.22). However, LSTV significantly altered the level of slippage. Patients with LSTV demonstrated strongly increased odds of spondylolisthesis at L4–L5 (OR 13.78; 95% CI 4.30–44.18; p < 0.0001) and a significant protective effect at L5–S1 (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02–0.23; p < 0.0001). No significant difference in slip severity was observed in pooled analyses ( p = 0.31). LSTV does not increase the overall risk of spondylolisthesis but acts as a biomechanical modifier that markedly redistributes pathology. It protects the transitional segment while shifting mechanical stress and instability to the cranial adjacent level (L4–L5).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kapetanakis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a768ecb39a600b3ed0adhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper