Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literature analysis maps quality assurance tools in ready-to-eat foods, suggesting future directions for improvement.
Ready-to-eat (RTE) foods require robust, auditable quality assurance (QA) because consumers apply little or no processing. We performed a structured Scopus review (2015–2026; search date: 19 October 2025) with VOSviewer bibliometrics to map QA tools and emerging directions. The corpus comprised 1,813 peer-reviewed items. Cooccurrence and overlay analyses indicate a dominant operational focus on shelf-life and post-process stability driven by packaging (MAP, active/edible coatings), temperature control (validation, rapid cooling), and microbiological verification (e.g., Listeria ), supported by environmental monitoring. A stable “core toolkit” underpins these practices: HACCP with prerequisite programs, ISO 22000-based FSMS, and GFSI-benchmarked schemes (BRCGS, IFS, FSSC 22000, SQF), often alongside ISO 9001. At process level, SPC and FMEA – plus, to a lesser extent, Six Sigma and QbD – target critical operations. System acronyms are under-represented in keywords, suggesting fuller visibility in texts. Digitalisation is rising: sensor-enabled cold-chain monitoring, blockchain pilots for traceability, and predictive analytics, with scalability challenges for SMEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ewa Szataniak (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: